The United Nations and International Crisis Management: The Dialectic of Balance between the Principle of Non-Intervention and Humanitarian Intervention

Abstract

The contemporary world is witnessing a notable increase in

the complexity of international crises, necessitating collective and coordinated international responses that transcend the capabilities of individual states, which underscores the crucial role of international organizations, particularly the United Nations (UN), in crisis management. This study examines the UN's pivotal role in managing contemporary international crises by analyzing its intervention mechanisms and the major challenges it faces. The research problem focuses on the extent of the UN's success in achieving a balance between the principle of non-intervention in states' internal affairs and the requirements of humanitarian intervention. The study adopts the descriptive-analytical approach and finds that the UN's effectiveness is diminished due to the influence of major powers' interests within the Security Council, leading to double standards in applying the principles of non-intervention and humanitarian intervention. Furthermore, the nature of international crises has undergone a qualitative shift, becoming more complex, multi-dimensional, and transnational, compelling international organizations to adopt modern mechanisms based on strategic planning, early warning, and multilateral coordination. The findings also highlight the growing complementary role of regional organizations in crisis management due to their geographical proximity and understanding of local contexts. The study concludes with recommendations to enhance the UN’s autonomy and effectiveness by reforming decision-making mechanisms in the Security Council and improving early warning and information management systems.