Analysis of Production Systems in Libyan Higher and Technical Education: Classifications, Determinants, and Development Strategies
Keywords:
educational productivity, Libyan higher education, technical education, educational production function, institutional efficiencyAbstract
Purpose: This study analyzes the production systems within Libyan higher and technical education institutions. It classifies their operational patterns, identifies the determinants of their efficiency, and proposes a measurable development model tailored to a post-conflict environment. The research addresses a critical gap between substantial public investment and poor institutional outcomes, a disconnect with serious implications for national development.
Methodology: A quantitative, descriptive-analytical approach was employed, supplemented by inferential statistical techniques including multiple regression analysis. A validated survey instrument was administered to 438 participants drawn from various educational institutions through a stratified convenience sampling procedure that ensured representation across institutional types (public universities, technical colleges, and higher institutes) and geographic regions (western, eastern, and southern Libya). A panel of five experts in education and statistics confirmed the content validity of the instrument. Cronbach's Alpha (α = 0.82) established its reliability. We utilized descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests, and multiple regression analysis to map key trends, test research hypotheses, and identify the most significant predictors of institutional productivity.
Findings: The data revealed a predominance of the traditional production system, with 42.5% of respondents indicating that theoretical education is the prevailing model. Multiple regression analysis identified funding adequacy (β = 0.31, p < 0.001), academic staff efficiency (β = 0.27, p < 0.001), and infrastructure quality (β = 0.22, p = 0.002) as the three strongest predictors of perceived institutional productivity, collectively explaining 41.3% of the variance (R² = 0.413, F(5,432) = 57.42, p < 0.001). A strong consensus favored curriculum reform (75.3%, 95% CI: [71.3%, 79.4%]) and the adoption of a dual education model (75.3%) as primary development strategies.
Originality/Value: This paper presents an empirical classification of educational production systems in Libya, contributing to the limited body of research on higher education productivity in conflict-affected Arab states. We propose a measurable development model built on three pillars—institutional governance reform, effective industrial partnership development, and the establishment of a sustainable financing system—operationalized through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and phased implementation timelines.
References
Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Libya. (2023). Statistical Indicators for Higher Education 2022–2023. Tripoli: Department of Statistics and Information.
UNESCO. (2022). Libya: Education Sector Analysis. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Central Bank of Libya. (2024). Revenue and Expenditure Statement for December 2023.
National Center for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Educational and Training Institutions, Libya. (2023). Annual Report on the Performance of Higher Education Institutions. Tripoli.
De Witte, K., & López-Torres, L. (2017). Efficiency in education: A review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 339–363.
Hanushek, E. A. (2020). Education production functions. In S. Bradley & C. Green (Eds.), The Economics of Education (2nd ed., pp. 161–170). Academic Press.
Badran, A., Baydoun, E., & Hillman, J. R. (Eds.). (2019). Major Challenges Facing Higher Education in the Arab World: Quality Assurance and Relevance. Springer.
World Bank. (2025). Libya Economic Update: Sustained Strong Growth Requires Structural Change. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Pogatsnik, M. (2018). Dual education: The win-win model of collaboration between universities and industry. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 8(3), 145–152.
Karami-Akkary, R. (2014). Facing the challenges of educational reform in the Arab world. Journal of Educational Change, 15(2), 179–202.
Ben Salah, A. (2021). University-Industry Collaboration in Tunisia: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(2), 150–165.
Jordanian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. (2023). National Innovation Strategy Report 2023. Amman.
Salmi, J. (2017). The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. World Bank Publications.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The Global Competitiveness Report 2023. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Jafar, H., & Knight, J. (2020). Higher education in the Arab States: The realities and challenges of regionalization. Comparative and International Education, 49(1), 1–21.
Cleary, J. L., Kerrigan, M. R., & Van Noy, M. (2017). Towards a new understanding of labor market alignment. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 32, pp. 577–629). Springer.
Al-Omrani, A. (2021). Educational Productive Efficiency. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyya.
Al-Abbar, A. (2022). Higher Education Policies in Libya: Reality and Ambition. Tripoli: Al-Rawad Publishing House.
Al-Zawi, A. (2021). Higher Education Economics. Benghazi: Libyan University Publications.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ivanenko, N., Varyvoda, K., Halukha, L., Petrovska, K., & Turgenieva, A. (2024). Armed conflicts and higher education: Challenges and opportunities for academic development in post-conflict regions. Academia, (35-36), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.26220/aca.5007
Glessa, S. A., Elmehdawi, R. R., & Elfakhri, M. M. (2025). Libyan universities: Navigating the global ranking maze. Libyan International Medical University Journal, 10(1), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1813022
Temoso, O., & Myeki, L. W. (2023). Estimating South African higher education productivity and its determinants using Färe-Primont index: Are historically disadvantaged universities catching up? Research in Higher Education, 64(2), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09699-3
Mohiuddin, K., Islam, A. A., Sharif, M. Y., Ahmed, S., & Abdullah, M. N. (2023). Potentialities and priorities for higher educational development in Saudi Arabia for the next decade: Critical reflections of the vision 2030 framework. Heliyon, 9(6), e16713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16713
ALECSO. (2025). The productive university: An Arab model. Proceedings of the Third Arab University Twinning Forum, November 12-13, 2025, Sohar University, Sultanate of Oman.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Mohamed, R. K. (2023). The dual education system in Egypt: The system's challenges and the way forward [Master's thesis, The American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2069/
Raxmatova, U. D. (2025). International experiences in implementing the dual education system and its impact on modern learning. Scientific Review of France, 1(9), 38-41. https://econferences.org/index.php/france/article/view/589
Coelho, D. P., & da Silva, R. (2026). Higher education in times of conflict: A systematic mapping review. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 24(1), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2025.2499608
Akkad, A. (2026). FIT higher education (for) reconstruction: Contributions of displaced Syrian academics for, in, and through higher education in conflict-affected Syria. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 24(1), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2025.2557451
