Peer Review Process

The Journal of Libyan Academy Bani Walid (JLABW) follows a rigorous and independent peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific validity of published research, in accordance with international publication ethics standards and COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines.

1. Initial Manuscript Screening

Upon submission through the journal’s electronic system, manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess:

  • Alignment with the journal’s aims and scope.
  • Compliance with manuscript preparation requirements.
  • Completion of submission requirements.
  • Initial ethical and technical compliance.
  • Similarity screening using plagiarism detection tools.

The Editorial Board may reject manuscripts that do not meet the journal’s requirements before peer review.

2. Selection of Reviewers

  • Reviewers are selected from qualified experts in the relevant research field.
  • Reviewer selection is based on scientific expertise and research experience.
  • Reviewers with potential conflicts of interest are excluded.
  • The journal ensures reviewer independence to maintain objective evaluation.

3. Peer Review Model

The Journal of Libyan Academy Bani Walid (JLABW) applies:

Double-Blind Peer Review

This means:

  • Authors’ identities are not disclosed to reviewers.
  • Reviewers’ identities are not disclosed to authors.
  • Manuscripts are evaluated solely based on scientific merit.

4. Review Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers assess manuscripts according to:

Originality and Scientific Significance

  • Novelty of the research topic.
  • Contribution to scientific knowledge.
  • Importance of findings.

Research Methodology

  • Clarity of objectives.
  • Appropriateness of study design and methods.
  • Accuracy of data collection and analysis.

Results and Discussion

  • Clarity and validity of results.
  • Consistency between findings and research objectives.
  • Quality of interpretation and comparison with previous studies.

Scientific Presentation Quality

  • Organization and structure.
  • Academic language quality.
  • Accuracy of tables, figures, and references.

5. Editorial Decisions

Based on reviewers’ reports, the editorial decision may be:

  • Accept.
  • Minor Revision.
  • Major Revision.
  • Reject.

The final decision is made by the Editorial Board based on reviewers’ recommendations and journal policies.

6. Revision and Re-evaluation

  • Authors must respond to reviewers’ comments professionally and systematically.
  • Revised manuscripts should be submitted within the specified period.
  • Manuscripts may be sent for further review when necessary.

7. Review Timeline

The journal aims to complete the peer-review process efficiently while maintaining rigorous scientific standards.

The review duration depends on:

  • Research field and manuscript complexity.
  • Availability of qualified reviewers.
  • Authors’ response time.

8. Confidentiality of Peer Review

  • All manuscript and review information is treated as confidential.
  • Reviewers and editors must not use unpublished information for personal purposes.
  • Review reports are securely maintained by the journal.

9. Appeals and Complaints

  • Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting clear scientific justifications.
  • Appeals and complaints are handled confidentially and fairly.
  • The Editorial Board reviews all appeals and makes appropriate decisions.

10. Compliance with International Standards

The Journal of Libyan Academy Bani Walid (JLABW) follows peer-review standards according to:

  • COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
  • DOAJ Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

For inquiries:

Email: labjournal.editor@gmail.com
Website:
https://journals.labjournal.ly/index.php/Jlabw/index